Verification.
Not just intake.
We've lived both sides of disclosure. Researchers want fast, fair outcomes. Companies want proof they can act on. Triage bridges the gap with automated verification that turns vulnerability reports into evidence-backed findings.
Why we started Triage
The bottleneck isn't finding vulnerabilities. It's confirming them.
Reporting volume keeps climbing. Triage capacity doesn't. Security teams spend hours reproducing submissions, chasing missing repro steps, and sorting signal from noise while real vulnerabilities sit unconfirmed.
We built Triage to make verification repeatable, auditable, and fast. So the time between "someone found something" and "it's fixed" gets as short as possible.
More reports should become real fixes. That's what we're building for.
What we believe
Principles.
The ideas that shape how we build Triage and how we think vulnerability disclosure should work.
Reproduce, Don't Trust
Every supported PoC runs in an ephemeral sandbox. We verify claims with evidence, not assumptions.
Speed Is a Feature
Triage time is vulnerability exposure time. Automated verification cuts hours to minutes.
Isolation by Default
Sandboxes are ephemeral, network-locked, and destroyed after every execution. Nothing escapes.
Transparent Outcomes
Every result includes the artifacts that produced it: screenshots, logs, traces. No black boxes.
Researchers Deserve Better
Fast, fair outcomes for researchers. Proof you can act on for companies. Disclosure should work for both sides.
Humans Where It Matters
Automation handles what it can prove. Human attention is reserved for what it can't.